The article states that Ethonel gas that made from plants are not effective and provides three reasons for supports. However, the professor states that using Ethanol gas is beneficial and none of these reasons are convinceable and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading says when Ethonel gas burn, it releases carbon dioxide that leads to global warming. This gas doesn’t protect the atmosphere. The professor refutes this point by explaining that Ethanol gas is made from plants and growing plants lead to reducing carbon dioxide because plants consume carbon dioxide.
Second, the article posits that using plants like corn for producing Ethanol gas reduce the amount of food that is eaten by animals. However, the professor says that it is possible to use other plants for producing Ethanol gas that is not eaten by animals. So, producing this gas doesn’t have any impacts on the animal’s food.
Third, the reading claims that producing this gas is costly. The price of this gas is as the same as fossil fuel and this is because of the help of governments. If a government doesn’t give any help, the price of it will be higher than now. The professor opposites this point by saying that when the amount of production rise, the price will drop to 50%. As a result production of this gas is beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ction rise, the price will drop to 50%. As a result production of this gas is bene...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97787610619 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60569882748 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469026548673 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5163869521 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5384615385 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328805048883 0.272083759551 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125377930403 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818001262868 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206224671493 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608829925417 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.