The article states that unlike other wood companies around the world, wood companies in the United States don’t attract to have Eco-certified and use it for their advertisement. The reading provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it is attractive for these companies to receive eco-certified and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that American people do not trust advertisements anymore and companies won’t take advantage of having this certification in their ads The professor refutes this point by saying that American people distinguish between ads don’t treat ads the same. He states that people have the confidence in this certification and understand the value of having these for wood products.
Second, the article posits that products which have this certification are more expensive than others. However, the professor says that is obvious those are expensive but their price is not much as higher as others. According to the professor, it’s worth to pay higher to protect our environment.
Third, the reading says that this certification is only for companies want to trade abroad. The professor opposes this point by explaining that wood business is wide. He explains that there are many wood companies that compete with each other. If companies in the United States ignore abroad markets and do not take part in a foreign competition, finally they lose their market even in internal markets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that unlike other woo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e but their price is not much as higher as others. According to the professor, it&...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44206008584 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86736395499 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523605150215 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8479434511 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401014534466 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142699325899 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819140241163 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239649592359 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729068221992 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.