TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Professors always were a core of all universities. Speaking personally, I suppose that investment of money in the professor’s salaries is important step to the improvement of the university in general. I will try to support my point of view by providing several examples.

In the first place, increasing salaries for professors will make them stay on the preferable positions and inspire them to work effectively. I suppose that money isn’t the most important motivator for professors to do their work well but I believe that univertities ought to pay well for the knowledge that this professor give to students. As an obvious example of that, I want to mention the new university which has been opened recently in the Russian Federation. The main policy of the university’s management was to provide the best education to the future students. For fulfiling this, they invited a lot of famous professors from all over Russia and provided them with housing and good salaries. In the light of above, I gather to say that this step, no doubts, took them a lot of labor and financies but, on the other hand, they straighten their educational system with the best brains in Russia.

Secondly, significant saleries is not only an attraction for young specialist but also one of the main indicator of university’s prestige. In other words, professors have valuable influece in education sphare and they are almost the most important people in the university’s structure. It isn’t a secret that most of the universities rankings take professors salaries as one of the indicator by which they decided what university is more prestigious. Of course, salaries also depend on university foundings, but I still support this idea, that universitites ought to provide comfortable enviroment to work process for the professors. In other words, they will be more concantrated on the job assignments and will not be bothered by the lack of finance.

to wrap up, quality of education depend on various indexes. However, the prestige of university is sum up from the number of talanted professors and students. Therefore, It is important to invest signifiant quantity of money to professor’s salaries.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'were'.
Suggestion: were always
Professors always were a core of all universities. Speaking pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
... be bothered by the lack of finance. to wrap up, quality of education depend on...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as to, i suppose, in general, no doubt, of course, in other words, in the first place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2338714177 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515406162465 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6825790658 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.941176471 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6470588235 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140998376092 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508208582395 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400412128782 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949171807438 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217831569839 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.