It is common knowledge that universities play a crucial role in the progress of today's society. A monetary policy like expenditure allocations is known as one of the important issues regarding the equality of education. The frequent question comes to mind is whether more salary for professors will enhance the education quality. In my opinion, this policy is not the best one for all cases and the answer may vary depending on different conditions.
First, it is no doubt that universities professors command a salary of more than &100,000 per year to become comfortable and can focus on educational issues. Indeed, the average salary is a key factor in job satisfaction and the shortage of financial will impede the concentration on education as well as enhance it. For instance, in my country, younger professors who start their job as an associate professor and have not a stable economic status have to take more courses to compensate for their own financial shortages. It can be clearly understood that increasing your obligation and an arduous task like teaching in a limit time results in a degradation in your performance and in better words, a deterioration in the quality of education.
Second, another undisputable fact is regarding students' requirement like facilities in the library and dormitory. Whether or not students’ requirement is satisfactory is a major question in any university. In my experience, students who suffer from a rudimentary problem like lack of enough equipment in a dormitory cannot stay focus on their education. For instance, someone with an unsuitable refrigerator in dormitory how can think about his/her philosophy exam?
In conclusion, unlike some people, who subscribe to this opinion that increasing the salary of university professors will enhance the quality of education, it is my deep conviction that neither professor's salary, students requirement nor other factors can consider independently in improving the quality of education in university.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...acilities in the library and dormitory. Whether or not students' requirement is satisfact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
..., it is my deep conviction that neither professors salary, students requirement nor other ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, regarding, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38412698413 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18990597447 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9484814833 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.461538462 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120313577443 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395220306585 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397407246105 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077566692378 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404736326847 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.