In the wake of our hectic lifestyle nowadays working hours and miscellaneous circumstances proceeding from them are of paramount importance. A question that might arise, with respect to this fact, is whether an increase in working hours and subsequently a decrease in the working days is desirable. As it is a moot point, there might not be a general agreement on this topic; however, personally, I rest on the belief that working for shorter hours a day and more days a week is more propitious. In the following, two convincing reasons are put forth to delineate my personal perspective.
One of the most, if not the only, convincing reasons is that after a certain duration working is no longer efficient and it hampers even the most diligent of people. Broadly speaking, working for excessive hours results in counterproductive activities. To elucidate more, our body has a limited capacity for doing a task and when this limit is reached it is better to stop forcing ourselves to push forward because resting in this stage can alleviate our brain and prepare us for further tasks in the future. To shed more light on this issue, one can refer to the results of some studies corroborating governments which determine less hours of work in their offices are the ones with higher level of productivity and it has been proven that lower but more efficient working hours are paving the way toward more accomplishments.
It cannot also go unnoticed that the more days one works the higher level of satisfaction he feels. Generally stated, people, in their intrinsic nature, feel the need to be useful and advantageous to their society and try to fulfill this need by working. To delineate it, if one only works 3 days a week it may result in more recreational activities but the long term effect of such a lifestyle would be depression and a decrease in the level of self-satisfaction especially in these days that we are more on our own and our life undergoes a paradigm shift compared to two decades ago when people interacted more with each other. However, there might be some exceptions and some people may find more hours a day more interesting or even efficient since they would be able to save the amount of time they spend in commuting.
In the light of the reasons explained, I think it is more efficient to work 3 days for longer hours than to work for 5days and shorter hours not only because of the level of efficiency one can perform at, but also because the intrinsic need to work within people. That is why it is strongly recommended that people keep up with the working hours as they are today and consider that reducing working days to just three days might affect their lives in the way they cannot imagine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...rroborating governments which determine less hours of work in their offices are the ones w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rroborating governments which determine less hours of work in their offices are the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the way toward more accomplishments. It cannot also go unnoticed that the mor...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, broadly speaking, i think, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74579831933 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76712095355 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478991596639 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.9 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1658663426 48.9658058833 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.357142857 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 20.6045352989 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264553066285 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103045163332 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656945324444 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187151020094 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415222500399 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 11.7677419355 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.