A parent wants to help his or her child become better at a skill such as playing a musical instrument or competing in a sport. Some people believe that the best way to do so is for the parent to require the child to practice every day for a set number of minutes or hours. Other people believe that it is best for the parent to encourage the child to practice only as much as the child wishes, with no requirement about the amount of time spent practicing.
There is a controversial debate about how parents should treat with their children when they want their children to learn new skills like playing a musical instrument or competing in a port. Whether they should require the child to practice every day for a specific time, or just encourage the child and give him the freedom to practice as much as he wishes. As it is a moot point, there might not be a general agreement on this topic. However, personally, I am of the belief that should parents require the child to do what he should do, it could have negative consequences in his learning process. In the following, Two of the most important consequences are put forth to clarify my personal perspective.
The first illustration which can demonstrate my opinion is that if children practice unwillingly, they will be exhausted very soon, in order, their creativity and productivity will be decreased. To elucidate more, when children work more than their capability, their mental activity reduced, so their practice will not be effective anymore. To give a good example, consider a case in which a boy is forced to practice Piano every day for five hours. It is obvious that if this boy's ability for practicing is just two hours per day, he could not benefit of the rest of his practice time and he will tire of practicing. Moreover, this boring practicing can harm his interest in learning piano in the long run. Hence, by forcing this child to practice, his parents not only help him to learn better, but also they harm his interest in piano.
Also, It cannot go unnoticed that if there is not any obligation, the people do their tasks better. Broadly speaking, people tend to protest against what they are forced to do. People prefer to pursue their desires freely, and should they obligated to do a task they like to do, they will reluctant to do it probably. In the previous example, for instance, the boy learning Piano, he might prefer to learn another instrument or practice whenever he wants. This obligation can cause he hates Piano, even if he was interested in it at the beginning. So parents should give their children the freedom to follow their own interests, and pave the way for them instead of obligate them. By just encouraging their children, they will certainly obtain better results.
In the light of above-mentioned reasons, I am a proponent of the idea that parents should not force their children to learn new skills. I feel this way, because learning new skills by force not only reduce their learning process but also reduce their interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'boys'' or 'boy's'?
Suggestion: boys'; boy's
... five hours. It is obvious that if this boys ability for practicing is just two hour...
^^^^
Line 3, column 790, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... his parents not only help him to learn better, but also they harm his interest in pia...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, broadly speaking, for instance, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81306306306 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63799702142 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488738738739 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7634939568 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.85 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237968687192 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766430573747 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601630566425 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152653923791 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07386113188 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.