TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe
Teachers have been searching to apply new method of learning which were effectvie from years ago. While some lecturers believe that individual assignments are more applicable, the rest of teachers assert that group working have more advantages. I agree with last statement and elaborate on my viewpoint as following paragraphes.
To start with, group working definitely is an opportunity to benefit from other classmates for learning better. Indeed, when students discuss ideas with each other it is more likely to could figure out other aspects of a problem, finding a proper solution and more, prevent making mistakes.
Moreover, when one be in a team there is no chance to be lazy. In principle, you should endeavor as much as other teammate to could take part in meetings or discussion. Thus, the more you make effort the more you will thrive.
Further, one of the ways to practice communicational skills is group working. What's more, the result of a recent experiment done in Standford University shows that pupils mostly recieve self-confidence when they do an activity in a group of friends and became endorsed by peers. Take this as an example; talking in front on thers and expressing your own opinion about a current issue. This let you to became as brave as a speaker after a while.
To conclude, teamworking certainly is better than independently working for above-mentioned reasons. It is why I personally prefer to be in a team.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...efit from other classmates for learning better. Indeed, when students discuss ideas wi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ommunicational skills is group working. Whats more, the result of a recent experiment...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, thus, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1977.66487455 61% => OK
No of words: 240.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02916666667 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90329972713 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654166666667 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0213885862 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2142857143 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252049605222 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687936385857 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460820286698 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120053762295 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428491304833 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.