It goes without saying that governments employ various methods to make their country flourish and prosper in today’s sophisticated and competitive world. Some people are of the opinion that it is more efficient for a country that the government spend more on education of young children rather than education of students studying in universities. However, as far as I am concerned, countries’ budget is better to spend on developing universities. The ensuing paragraphs will elaborate on this claim.
First of all, universities generate advanced and in most cases practical science which can apply to present industries as soon as possible. It is crystal clear that the more universities of a county possesses sophisticated and advanced tools and equipment, the more its professors and students are able to propose developing scientific theories and create new inventions. In addition, industries such as automotive, aerospace, and IT have to update their designs and plans for the future in order to keep up with foreign competing industries. Therefore, new inventions and ideas created by universities could significantly help those industries to improve the countries economical state. In this line of thought, should governments pay more attention to universities, people of their country definitely enjoy more stable and thriving economy.
Another important reason is that by giving more attention to universities, the level of education of the whole country could be enhanced significantly. It is no secret to anybody that if a student graduate in a high-ranked and prestigious university, his or her overall understanding of the world will be wider and enjoy broader perspective. In this vein, every student who come back from the university can affect their parents and siblings with his or her bright thoughts. A personal example can drive this notion home. I have a cousin who is educated in one of most brilliant universities in our country. After he finished his education, he returned to our city. As time passed, his brother and sister, who did not like to go to university, were inspired by his ideas and line of thoughts. As a result, they began to study for attending the university too. Had our government not payed this much attention to constructing such a high-level university, my cousin and his siblings would not have thrilled by up-to-date science.
In sum, having considered the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I firmly believe that funding universities is undeniably more helpful to a country's development because it produces fresh knowledge. Not only that, but also it greatly improves the people's overall education and understanding level.
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...s such as automotive, aerospace, and IT have to update their designs and plans for t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35849056604 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12970187396 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563679245283 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6577629605 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168011151438 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497700532511 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680781991831 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114602528447 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775244536425 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.