tpo 41
Without any shadow of doubt, people are the cornerstone of a successful society; indeed, the more qualified individuals of a country are, the more powerful the country is. In this regard, education plays a pivotal role in preparing people for the future. With this in mind, given the existing educational situation, some believe that compared to the past, nowadays, teachers are more appreciated, while others hold the opposite view. I, personally, subscribe to the first attitude based on quite a few reasons, three of the most substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that in today's modern world, every country has to be in rush so as not to be left behind in contending for the "field of competition", and they work more and more to achieve their goals, which bring them about fortune and well-fare. Given the fact that the 21st century is considered as the technology development and knowledge era, we cannot deny the role of teachers in bringing up qualified people, which bring countries about welfare in general and better financial prosperous in particular.
Another interpretation as to why I do not concur with the latter perspective in the introductory paragraph lies in the fact that it is crystal clear that as time passes and mankind become more developed, they become more aware of the importance of children's upbringing. The more knowledgeable one is, the better job position he or she has; therefore, they are more cognizant of the role of knowledge and education in the success of their children in the future. Accordingly, nowadays, teachers are more valued by society.
Last but not least, in the past, in order to be a teachers, one should only pass the university entrance exam; while, nowadays, teachers need to pass a great deal of exams not only to be accepted as a teacher, but also to hold their job. For example, Mr Ahmadi is one of the most famous professors in my university, he teaches mathematic. He is often supposed to take different courses and exams to be familiar to the most up-to-date methods of teaching to improve his teaching techniques and stay in his job position. As a result, it stands to reasons that today, teachers are more appreciated compared to before.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned arguments discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that teachers are more rewarded in comparison to before on the grounds that people are more aware of the role of teachers in both nurturing of their offspring and society. Moreover, teachers are required to pass some stages in order to be competent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a teacher' or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: a teacher; teachers
... not least, in the past, in order to be a teachers, one should only pass the university en...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 456, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
...the most up-to-date methods of teaching to improve his teaching techniques and stay in his...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 547, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'reason'.
Suggestion: reason
...job position. As a result, it stands to reasons that today, teachers are more appreciat...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in general', 'in particular', 'in summary', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218436873747 0.229887763892 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.14629258517 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0861723446894 0.0866891130778 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.064128256513 0.046263068375 139% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0440881763527 0.0685040099705 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140280561122 0.118717715034 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0440881763527 0.0351676179071 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90134555874 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0380761523046 0.0309702414327 123% => OK
Particles: 0.00200400801603 0.00188951952338 106% => OK
Determiners: 0.0961923847695 0.0887237588012 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00400801603206 0.0209618222197 19% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.00801603206413 0.0139019557991 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2632.0 2387.08602151 110% => OK
No of words: 439.0 408.028673835 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99544419134 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.359908883827 0.338922669872 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284738041002 0.251872472559 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.21867881549 0.174417080927 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145785876993 0.112833075102 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90134555874 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519362186788 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 59.4979534173 59.2087087015 100% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 29.2666666667 20.5533526081 142% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8115792973 48.84282405 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.466666667 120.699889404 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2666666667 20.5533526081 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.06666666667 0.644075263715 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 57.7404707669 45.7405998639 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.58267716535 1.45489161554 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13678570843 0.103427244359 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0592056953863 0.0752933317313 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.624397724632 0.497263757937 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.197867551602 0.151897553556 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.424227007436 0.336927656856 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0520126010827 0.067059652881 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.86379928315 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.