TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
That teachers are valuable assets of one society is an axiom. Significantly, due to the need for society to education and have a sophisticated people, it is necessary to respect the teachers. A question which is a matter, a controversial one is whether nowadays teachers have the same value than before or not. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am to a great extent to believe that teachers would not be appreciated equal the past. In what follows, I will pinpoint some outstanding reasons.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justify the thesis is that the accessibility of people to the knowledge resources has been greater than before. Simply stated, in this technology era, no one cannot reach the given information while there are the Internet and many social media which is easily achievable for everyone in everywhere. Broadly speaking, people eliminate their need to knowledge with other assistance except for exclusive dependency on teachers. For instance, take my nephew into account, he has access to all kinds of electronic devices such as mobile phone, tablet, and laptop and I see always he is searching everything he needs on the internet of other materials in these devices. Accordingly, he claims that he can accomplish his assignments at home without any classes and teacher. Obviously, this kind of thought will be spread among other people whom it means the teachers do not have the previous site in the community.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, the increasing number of schools and educational institutions is another point which requires meticulous attention. To put in the general words, the government itself let the private agencies to add new institutions to the community. Whereas, the more educational institutions, the more unprofessional teachers will be increased. Needless to say that, the validity of professional teachers with a high experience will be affected by this matter. As it can be testified from noteworthy meaningful statistics which states that about twenty percent of private institutions which has added newly have not the half of many state schools efficiencies in the educational improvement of students. Logically speaking, the society will be reluctant to acclaim the teachers as long as the numbers of unprofessional trainers are ascending more than before.
In one word, there are many reasons which can be state for this catastrophic phenomenon in the society and I mentioned some of them. To recapitulate the reasons, not only high pace increasing of technology have hand in this matter, but also increasing the number of institutions and alongside unprofessional teachers are effective to decline the society attention towards the teachers. But the answer of some questions is like a drop in bucket and it is that how we can help to return that previous noteworthiness to the teachers?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'Internets'?
Suggestion: Internets
...e given information while there are the Internet and many social media which is easily a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rience will be affected by this matter. As it can be testified from noteworthy mea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, whereas, while, broadly speaking, except for, for instance, kind of, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 471.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18683651805 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04753977891 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522292993631 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0462294504 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.15 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.55 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125316391816 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424061293369 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319610773277 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817550831851 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249585280686 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.