Educating children is the most important thing in thier childhood and adolescence. A well education can help a student to become more successful and as a result have a better future. But, today technological devices change the way of educating children. In past, teachers were the only source that could help the students but most of the students have access to the net and could learn from net easily. Some people believe that these changes reduced the value of the teachers in the society; others would disagree. I think that teachers were more appreciated in past than nowadays for the following reasons.
First and foremost, technological devices reduced the need for the teachers in order to learn. With advancement of technology, people have access to the internet in almost every where and as a result they could easily find the answers to their quastions through the net so the scignificane of teachers is fading. For instance, l have a nephew who is nine years old. She is really intelligent and she is curious about everything and as she knew that I am a astronomer, she always asked a lot of quastions about the world and other planets from me. As a result, when I am in my sister's home, I spend most of my time answering her questions. Last month, I went to visit them. I was surprised that she did not ask any quastions. So, I asked her if she had anything to ask but she said no. My sister said that they bought her a tablet and she could find all the answers to her quastions from the net. My nephew, explained that she had flu and she could not be present in her classes for a week and by using of some online courses not only she did not missed anything but also she got the best score in the exam too. This experience taught me that nowadays, teachers are not as important as they used to be in past.
Second, teachers like other human beings can make mistake which is not good. When teachers make mistakes, the student would think that their teacher is not really master in the subject of the class and so they cannot rely on her in order to learn because she is not a reliable source. For example, last week, I read in the newspaper that researchers in Germany conducted a research which was started about twenty years ago, in which they compare the importance of teachers in the learning progress of the children. The researchers claimed that in pas when the teachers made mistakes students did not know and as a result they continued their studies based on those wronge informations that they had learned from their teachers. Thus, it was really important to select someone as a teacher. But, today studetns can easily find out when their teachers are wronge. As you can see, when students understand they their teachers make mistake, they lost their trust to their teachers and behave them in different and less appreciated way.
In sum, though some may believe that teachers are great people and teaching is a valuable job in all times; but as you can see teaching is not as important job as it used to be. I really think that schools and universities should find better and more educated teachers and professors in order to avoid distruction the importance of schools and universities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...s change the way of educating children. In past, teachers were the only source that cou...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...e have access to the internet in almost every where and as a result they could easily find ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ut everything and as she knew that I am a astronomer, she always asked a lot of q...
^
Line 3, column 1047, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'miss'
Suggestion: miss
...ome online courses not only she did not missed anything but also she got the best scor...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1202, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...are not as important as they used to be in past. Second, teachers like other human b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, second, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2648.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 572.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62937062937 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52202872339 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449300699301 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5646996215 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139245622378 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445260854579 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053919865092 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886111666071 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319493073521 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.