TPO 42 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your an

Essay topics:

TPO 42
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It critically affects our quality of life whether we are satisfied with our works. I admit that there are a lot of opinions about this; however, workers can increase their motivation for their works by doing many different types of tasks, in my opinion. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.

To begin with, workers can learn many kinds of skills by coping with a wide variety of tasks. These days we have to acquire a lot of skills to increase our salaries. By tackling different types of tasks, we expand our range of skills. Besides, increasing what we can do allows us to enjoy our work more. For example, one of my friends, Ken, is an engineer for a famous IT company. He first worked as a software engineer, but his manager let him do the tasks requiring hardware knowledge. He felt difficulties in tackling his work at first due to the shortage of knowledge of this field. However, through this work, he could expand his skill. He could increase his salary because the engineer who has both software and hardware skills is valuable. Furthermore, He seems to enjoy his work than before.

Next, we can see our project from a different point of view. When we work at a company, we have to collaborate with many people who play different roles. If we play the same for a long time, we cannot perceive the whole of the project. On the other hand, if we do a wide variety of tasks in the project, we can understand the importance of our work and increase our motivation. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I worked as an engineer for an electronics company for a long time. I was bored with my work because I had done similar tasks for many years. I asked my boss to allow me to work as a salesperson, and he approved my suggestion. After I started working as a salesperson, I had many opportunities to learn about the customer's demand and the importance of the role of the engineering department. Through this experience, I could understand our project more and increase my motivation for work.

In conclusion, I strongly feel that workers can feel more satisfied with their work by doing many types of tasks. This is because we can acquire many kinds of skills and it helps us understand our project more.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...eir motivation for their works by doing many different types of tasks, in my opinion. I feel t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...ds, Ken, is an engineer for a famous IT company. He first worked as a software engineer...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 577, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... had done similar tasks for many years. I asked my boss to allow me to work as a ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58190709046 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66164518056 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457212713936 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 22.0 9.59856630824 229% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4469637238 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.96 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.36 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160994527407 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530397473909 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470199353684 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12181370958 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193479236973 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.