Big enterprises have been focusing on improving worker's satisfactory level since the expansion of their sizes. Creating an environment that make employees of those enterprises feel accomplished enables their passion and motivation on achieving more. The managers of the workers may ask themselves daily: Would employees be more satisfied working on varied or repetitive tasks? While repetitive works tend to develop mastery of one skill, I personally would commit to a job with diversified duties.
In work settings, people are more satisfied after conquering works that challenge them. Solving different problems and multitasking at the same time tremendously increase the challenging aspect of a job. I discovered an intriguing phenomenon during my past internship. In my team, people who spent significantly more time developing features of a product never complained, whereas people writing simple documentations of the same product either constantly got tired of their jobs or risked losing them. The latter task imposed a lot less pressure on workers than implementing various features of a product. However, those simple and repeated writing tasks did not challenge the workers enough to give them a sense of accomplishment, the source of satisfaction, leading to their suboptimal attitudes toward works in a long run.
Furthermore, performing varied tasks at work equips a person multiple skill sets. In such a rapidly developing world, the more knowledge you have, the more competitive you are. Given that prestigious companies nowadays raise their bar in their interviews every year, it's easy to see that people have a tendency to learn more during their work just to have a smooth experience in the competitive job market. In the psychological point of view, works involving different types of tasks make workers feel more achieved, because in addition to their income, they gain an edge over their potential rivals on the job market as a result of the nature of their work.
In conclusion, workers tasked with different types of work not only face more challenges, but also push their limits to acquire more knowledge. Consequently, in such work environment, the pressure they deal with motivates them, and the skills they develop benefit them, both with great amount of satisfaction.
Essay evaluation report
Creating an environment that make employees of those enterprises feel accomplished enables
Creating an environment that makes employees of those enterprises feel accomplished enables
---------------------
No serious issues found. Got better.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 361 350
No. of Characters: 1898 1500
No. of Different Words: 202 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.359 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.258 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.905 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.562 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.099 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.52 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.136 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38781163435 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97012593746 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587257617729 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7449943718 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5625 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184067859379 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672239922652 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460504850941 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122413335025 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221975510505 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.