All students inevitably will have to do oral presentation individually or in groups during their academic lives. In these apresentations any student may do some mistakes and be corrected during the apresentation. However some of them does not know how to react if their work have something incorrect, and the teacher correct them. Should they interupt the lecturer, should they wait until fish the class to talk to the professor or should they simply forget about it? Throught my 5 years of graduation in mining engineering I had to several oral presentation to make. Personaly I think that the awnser may vary depending on how big is the mistake.
The First thing I do, when something like that happens to me, is see if the my error is a big deal or not. If it is a huge mistake that compromise the apresentation, I certainly would appologise my selfe to the professor and ask some time to do presentation once againg. If the problem is simple, I will also appologise and say to de audience that I'll correct and have more attention next time. For example, once I had a group presentation to do, that consistis in sell a project to investidor represented by three professors. During our presentation there was a mistake in the project's cash flow. We they noticed and call my attention, I simply said that I will talk with other consultants (my colleges) and later explaing the error. It was a professional awnser. That's why I said befor that the reaction may vary according to the circunstance.
The only thing I wold never do was keep quiet and ignore the mistake. I think that it may give a wrong impression to the audence. It is like I dont care at all to the presentation.
Having that in mind to sum up I think the we need to be prepered to awser or react according to the level of mistake and situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... be corrected during the apresentation. However some of them does not know how to react...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'my'?
Suggestion: the; my
...hing like that happens to me, is see if the my error is a big deal or not. If it is a ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion there was a mistake in the projects cash flow. We they noticed and call my a...
^^
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...he error. It was a professional awnser. Thats why I said befor that the reaction may ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ep quiet and ignore the mistake. I think that it may give a wrong impression to t...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...impression to the audence. It is like I dont care at all to the presentation. Ha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
... Having that in mind to sum up I think the we need to be prepered to awser or react a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the level of mistake and situation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, for example, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59692307692 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87070492137 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2541788025 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103821476913 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308562210445 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342522370868 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562674724879 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231613299884 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.