TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa

Speak in public can be considered one of the most uncomfortable tasks. Even those who are used to it, like teachers or meeting leaders, eventually get nervous and say incorrect or inaccurate information while talking in front of a class or an audience. In light of this, in instead of interrupt their line of thought right away, this essay will talk about why I think is politer to wait for the best moment to talk and make your point.
First, it is not because someone say something incorrect in my opinion that this information is, in fact, incorrect. Maybe there is a deep research behind it, and interrupt someone right away might cause an embarrassing situation if the person who interrupted is actually wrong. I remember when I was in a literature lecture in college and a student interrupted a specialist about the author Bertolt Brecht. The specialist was talking about Brecht’s life and according to the student, he said something wrong about Brecht’s father. However, the specialist ended saying that he traveled to Germany and studied his life for more than 6 years, which caused an embarrassing moment for the student and for the whole lecture by itself.
Second, when we are speaking, a lot of thoughts come into our mind at the same time. It is not only because someone said something wrong that the person meant to it. When I was in high school, our teacher was organizing group-work and said that in a class of 30 students, we should create 7 groups of 4. For some reason, two students missed the class on that day, and all the groups were formed. However, my group remembered of our missing friends, and in instead of talk to the teacher and reorganize the whole class again, we waited until the end of the class and kindly asked if our friends could join our group, quickly solving the problem.
As last, speak in public is something that requires focus and preparation, and a teacher or a meeting leader probably had to prepare their class or speech before. Something unexpected in the middle of the speech can cause a break on the flow, as well as force the speaker to detour the previously prepared planning. When I watched my first TED, the lecturer was interrupted by someone in the audience. As we know, TED speakers have few minutes to give the whole lecture, and due to the question, she had to apologize because she did not have enough time to say everything she planned.
To sum up, interrupting the speaker can not only cause an uncomfortable moment for the person, but also spoil speech’s planning and make the person lose its line of thought, and these are few of several reasons why I think is better to wait until the class or meeting is over to talk to the teacher or speaker.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 133, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'deep research'.
Suggestion: deep research
... is, in fact, incorrect. Maybe there is a deep research behind it, and interrupt someone right ...
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... were not in the class on that day, and all of the groups were formed. However, my group r...
Line 4, column 484, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'she'?
Suggestion: the; she
...whole lecture, and due to the question, the she had to apologize because she did not ha...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, while, as for, i think, in fact, talking about, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64389233954 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61838550048 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503105590062 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.9551936014 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.941176471 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4117647059 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12979938619 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443537489775 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380848523387 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744751044638 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380093549591 0.0645574589148 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.