Most people think that if someone talks in a meeting and then one of the audiences butts in, it is a sign of immature. However, I personally believe that it is not true. Conversly, it is a sign of being all ears in that meeting and showing that you are completely paying attention to all the words that the speaker use. Moreover, It will be a wake- up call for the speaker to be more careful. So, it will prevent from further mistakes. Furthermore, even if the speaker makes any mistakes it is better to be corrected immediately because it may cause serious problems for the people attending in the meeting when they want to go it over. In the following paragraphs we discuss these mentioned reasons.
Firstly, as we said correcting mistakes in a meeting right away means audiences are completely conscious about all the things mentioned in the meeting. So, the speaker finds out that there is no reason for any mistake and will try to prevent all the facts correctly. For example, he will check all the things which is going to be raised to the table before meeting.
Secondly, it will be a warn for the speaker that you are talking with people who are completely inform about verifying all the things you are bringing up. So, he will give a hundred and ten percent to avoid from any mistake. For example, you teach English in a class that all students know a thing or two about it, so you wil have a difficult eyes because you can not pull the wool their eyes.
Thirdly, when speaker makes a mistake and audiences prevent from any objection, it would give rise to major problems for audiences who did not understand the speaker made mistake. For instance, if a teacher teaches something incorrectly, the students might drive round the bend because they will not be able to make sense of if when they want to review it.
To sum up, jumping in a speaker during a meeting when he is making mistake not only do sign of bothering others but it also have some good results like:
It prevents from further mistakes, shows audience are completely paying attention to the things that the speaker is talking, puts a stop to serious problems to those take part in the meeting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 22, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...re meeting. Secondly, it will be a warn for the speaker that you are talking wi...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'informed'.
Suggestion: informed
... talking with people who are completely inform about verifying all the things you are ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 327, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (wil) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...now a thing or two about it, so you wil have a difficult eyes because you can not pu...
^^^^
Line 9, column 344, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'eye'?
Suggestion: eye
...o about it, so you wil have a difficult eyes because you can not pull the wool their...
^^^^
Line 17, column 125, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...do sign of bothering others but it also have some good results like: It prevents fr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6189258312 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45436631835 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488491048593 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0226848315 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131547798457 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473273064469 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474633416326 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753779723446 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381892667108 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.