The passage and lecture both discuss three hypotheses around the way that a group of marine animals, which are called Agnostid, behave and feed. The reading claims that these animals were primitive anthropods-relatives of modern insects. In contrast, the professor explains that the justifications of reading are not convincing, and she refutes each of the author's reasons.
Firstly, the text indicates that they may have belonged to a group of predators hunting smaller animals. However, the professor refutes this and says that all anthropoids have large and well-developed eyes because vision is one of the most important factors for hunting. But, Agnostics had such a tiny and poorly-developed eyes that if they wanted to chase any prey, they might have used other organisms to help them although there is no solid evidence for this claim.
Secondly, the passage puts out that these animals house in seafloors. On the other hand, the speaker mentions that Agnostics inhabit in different areas which means moving from one place to another very fast. This is in direct contrast with animals that live on seafloors because they usually do not have this kind of ability and live in small geographic areas.
Thirdly, the reading points that these animal are parasite and feed from larger organisms. In contrast, the lecturer denies this and talks that parasites live in certain limits and their population is not very large. otherwise, they will kill their host. So, their large population convince us to rule out this claim.
In conclusion, based on reasons and analysis given by the professor, Agnostics are not like free-swimming predators hunting smaller animals or dwell on seafloors or parasites that live on larger organisms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Otherwise
...and their population is not very large. otherwise, they will kill their host. So, their l...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31182795699 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76055011536 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5770609319 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8535712953 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293321246061 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843381325913 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058714795053 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141442389791 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034824548385 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.