Admitting mistakes that people have made is not shameful, and those mistakes are the way for individuals to learn. No one in want any errors, which causes people to feel harmful, but it occurs reluctantly at all, generating both positive and negative results for each. In my opinion, the appropriate option is talking to them in private after they finish their mission. In whatever cases, it is better to correct people gently rather than being aggressive or mute. It can be challenging telling people they are mistaken, but there is the time when it is necessary to do so.
First, it is cruel to correct someone in front of a crowd. It merely brings embarrassment to people being afraid of their faults instead of helping them to improve their work, and it also makes them feel guilty about failure. This sense of shame defeats their self-esteem and destroy their ambitions, likely forcing them to admit they are criminals. As a result, people would prefer to live and act in ways to prevent mistakes and fear to expand their comfort zones or jump outside their protective boxes. For example, I had corrected one of my students in public, and thereby she sensed sinful from their mistakes and escaped far away from the class. Without doubts, it is inappropriate and does not help people in growing from flaws and errors.
Second, the vital lesson in all mistake-making is to learn from it rather than neglect it. Progress will be a winding path, but if people could keep learning from their mistakes along the way would help them receive improvements. Otherwise, if all people stay silent-no one point out an error, it would be a risk to society. The fallacy, therefore, would be the truth because the balance of truths has broken. For instance, in the dystopian novel ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ written by George Orwell-1984, it described a situation absurd, all individuals there zipped up their mouths and blocked in the door to truths although they knew something is incorrect. As the novel mentioned, “Truth is a thought crime, big brother is watching you.”
In conclusion, it is by far a challenge to correct people in a gently right manner. However, helping people to learn from their failures and mistakes is vital to each because errors and flaws are gifts in people’s learning and growth, and the power of truth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...risk to society. The fallacy, therefore, would be the truth because the balance o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94949494949 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72802552274 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563131313131 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5533874823 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0709931361515 0.236089414692 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025765395433 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209304339473 0.0737576698707 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0490412353273 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103942373089 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.