Suppose that you are sitting in a meeting room and your boss is speaking volubly. After perceiving that he said something wrong, what would you do? Pointing out the mistake immediately or keeping silent like others? In my opinion, I prefer to talk to my boss after the meeting with the following statements.
To begin with, correcting their mistake right away will get us trapped in various troubles in the future. Firstly, this seemingly outspoken behavior would lead to an impression of being impolite, whereas courteous is the most important quality that every employee should possess from a leader’s perspective. It is clear that making our boss annoyed will result in relatively slower promotion, which will consequently exacerbate our financial burden and spoil our life quality. Meanwhile, it will also expose our lack of communication skills. Because communication between two people absolutely lays a foundation for their friendship, it is not hard to imagine that we will have difficulty in making friends who can offer assistance to us when we confront problems from any aspects. Therefore, it is not recommended to interrupt and point out the error directly.
Furthermore, saying nothing will bring us unexpected consequence in some cases. It is because that an unnoticeable mistake in a leader’s decision will be amplified and eventually damage the whole company. Nokia could be a perfect example of this point. Mobile phones produced by Nokia used to be prevalent. However, ignoring the advent of iOS and other smart systems, its CEO insisted on developing devices equipped with their slower and outdated Symbian system. Unfortunately, this decision lead to Nokia’s decline in the following years and their staffs suffered a lot during this depression. Considering the fatal result, we should not play dumb and keep quiet.
Compared to those options mentioned above, pointing out that problem after the meeting are more conducive to our prospect. Firstly, it makes the leader aware of our profession. Kind of surprising but reasonable is that some administrators prefer those subordinates who can strengthen the company’s productivity and sustainability by figuring out inconspicuous mistakes. Secondly, the leaders are bound to be grateful to us because we maintain their self-esteem. Relying on their authority, they desire to expose their faults to us as less as possible. Last but not least, it reflects our high emotional quotient, demonstrating our social skills.
Now the problem becomes easier: Would you like to experience unwilling troubles or to facilitate your career? Maybe nobody prefers the former. Therefore I strongly suggest everyone point out the leader’s mistake when others have left.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 809, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended interrupting'.
Suggestion: recommended interrupting
... from any aspects. Therefore, it is not recommended to interrupt and point out the error directly. Fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 545, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...re to expose their faults to us as less as possible. Last but not least, it reflec...
^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...areer? Maybe nobody prefers the former. Therefore I strongly suggest everyone point out t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, kind of, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45667447307 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01594611721 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604215456674 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0830192145 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6153846154 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4230769231 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88461538462 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123243616578 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328695934021 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035062434385 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745775651614 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465214180942 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.