Since the dawn of humans, parents have tried to guide their offspring throughout their life to prosper and flourish. There has been no shortage of debates among individuals on whether, nowadays, parents have more control over their kids’ decision-making than in the past. I vehemently cling to the notion that children are more independent now than ever. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two of my most prominent reasons for advocating this viewpoint.
The first reason coming to mind, elucidating my standpoint, is concerned with the issue that contemporary young people are more cognizant of their surroundings compared to their parents. To be more specific, with the advent of modern technology, especially the internet, and the ever-increasing pace of its improvements, children have access to a considerable amount of information and knowledge, therefore, they can gain a comprehensive insight into every matter in the most convenient way. As a result, children, specifically juveniles, start to think that they’re wiser than their parents, and they know enough to make decisions for themselves. Technology has created a false sense of wisdom in adolescents, and just because their parents are out of step with the modern world, they think they’re not qualified to decide for them.
Furthermore, another equally compelling reason for corroborating my stance lies in the fact that youths in contemporary society are more stubborn compared to the past. Youngsters used to be more humid and naive back then. Consequently, kids don’t want their parents to control their life. There are a couple of hypotheses that can explain why youths are more stubborn today. One of which is that a plethora of movies and video games in this hectic modern era has influenced their pattern of thoughts, insights, and manners. The main character of these movies is a hero who has rebellious thoughts all the time. After watching these movies, children start to imitate those characters’ thoughts and behaviors. A personal example can drive this notion home. My nephew used to be a solace boy, but as soon as his parents got him a video game console, he has become noticeably more rebellious and doesn’t listen to his parents whatsoever.
To put it all in a nutshell, having all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I strongly believe that young people are now more independent in their decisions making, on the ground that they have access to a notable amount of information now and think they’re well aware of everything, as well as they are significantly more stubborn.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21666666667 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97615142832 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540476190476 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.2430430798 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.722222222 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225968628547 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670778526478 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596791133344 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140403185865 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422067118696 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.