TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends

Connections define who we are. People tend to struggle with who and how long to befriend someone. However, it depends on people's intentions in building these relationships. Even though some people may be attached to retain old friends, they should consider making new friends. The ability to make new friends easily brings about diversity and new experience, all of them resulting in fascinating happiness.

Firstly, making new friends introduces diversity into people's life happiness. For growth in life, people need to have different and new individuals around them. When individuals connect with new friends easily, they adapt quickly to the new environment. For instance, US universities have increased the number of internationals on their campuses for an increase in diversity. However, if it was not for its benefits, they would not have introduced such a policy. In these schools, students come as strangers but with a will of making of new friends, they are exposed to diverse cultures and ideas which give them a glimpse of the world's reality. As a result, they are amazed by how little they know the rest of the world which intriguers their happiness and enthusiasm. This shows that introducing new friends in people's lives brings more contentment.

In addition, new friendships equip people with new experiences. As people gain new friends, they are exposed to new perspectives on life and other people's point of views. For these experiences, they manage to adapt to different surroundings. For example, when I joined a new high school, I was entitled to adapt to the new place. However, it would have been enormously hard if I wanted to keep my old friends and avoid making new ones. Letting myself, embrace new colleagues' perceptions gained me a perfect adaption that would be a guide in my last year. Had it not been for my happiness, I would not have made new friends. It is pretty clear that the new friendship comes with new experience and skills.

In conclusion, making new friends easily introduces diversity and enhances new experiences sharing. It might be hard to make new friends but as the challenges increase so are their advantages and lessons. People should risk for broad and advantageous connections.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... ideas which give them a glimpse of the worlds reality. As a result, they are amazed b...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... comes with new experience and skills. In conclusion, making new friends easily...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10899182561 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86867799787 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520435967302 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7050313733 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.125 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2916666667 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.79166666667 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236489082737 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819701706055 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483242177314 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162408496246 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015523174838 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.