Throughout education in university, students take different courses, some of which are related to their major and some of which are not. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars on whether students, no matter what field they're studying, should take history courses. I vehemently cling to the notion that students should be obliged to study history no matter what their interest is. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two of my most prominent reasons for advocating this viewpoint.
First and foremost, history repeats itself, and if we don't study our past, we're condemned to repeat it. Every individual in society has an impact on the country's history and path. Therefore, it's vital for every person, no matter what their profession is, to study history and learn from their ancestor's mistakes. Moreover, studying history will provide students with highly-developed cognitive skills and critical thinking. They can learn about the deleterious repercussions of each ideology and perspective. As a result, they can identify these ways of thinking in their society and prevent its propaganda. An example can drive this notion home. For instance, we all know that fascism and racism led to genocide and an incredible number of innocent people died as a result of these ideologies. By studying history, youth can detect if a politician is taking the same path and prevent him in the first place.
Furthermore, another equally compelling reason for corroborating my stance lies in the fact that by studying history, youngsters can preserve their cultural heritage. It's crystal clear that culture is one of the most important aspects of each country, and the diversity of cultures around the globe is valuable, and every individual should be proud of their culture and try their best to save it. By reading history, students get a chance to know more about their culture, rituals, and ceremonies. As a result, they would be proud of themselves and their culture and try to stop the penetration of other cultures. For example, long ago, people in my country used to celebrate the advent of spring with social gatherings, dancing, and giving gifts to each other. Unfortunately, the contemporary generations are not interested in this tradition, and they think it doesn't belong to the modern era and should be annihilated. If students knew more about this tradition and its history and benefits, they wouldn't though this way.
To put it all in a nutshell, having all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I strongly believe that students should read history, on the ground that this would enable them to make better political decisions, as well as they get to know more about their culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
... whether students, no matter what field theyre studying, should take history courses. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...most, history repeats itself, and if we dont study our past, were condemned to repea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 863, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ed in this tradition, and they think it doesnt belong to the modern era and should be ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1000, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...tion and its history and benefits, they wouldnt though this way. To put it all in a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13483146067 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76772022029 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537078651685 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3932832151 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.80952381 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1904761905 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280625065103 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829432943503 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871564059198 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180632168464 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841406697934 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.