TPO 53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

TPO 53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In this progressive and sophisticated world, the government always confronts the dilemma of whether to spend more money on improving Internet access or improving public transportation. While some people are inclined towards the idea that the government should allocate considerable money to improving Internet access, others, on the other hand, are against this idea. As far as I am concerned, I am of the opinion that the advantages of investing in developing public transportation are immense and indisputable in comparison to the Internet. In the following paragraph, I will delve into some reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
The first noteworthy reason coming to my mind is that a prosperous public transportation system can positively influence people's health and well-being. Nowadays, the number of people suffering from chronic diseases like diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases has increased substantially. It is scientifically proven that the primary cause of this increasing trend is the sedentary lifestyle caused by using private vehicles. In contrast to cars, using public transportation involves some moving and walking when changing bus stops and train stations. As a consequence, people's physical activities will escalate by this investment because advanced public transportation encourages many people to shift from their cars to public transport. For instance, the result of the study in my town has shown that the development of public transportation has escalated people's physical activities 4 hours a week.
Another exquisite point to be mentioned is that in this way the government is able to tackle countless environmental issues. In the modern world, air pollution gives rise to global warming that leads to numerous adverse consequences like threatening animal specie’s lives, melting glaciers, and climate change. The main cause of these serious problems is the extensive exploitation of fossil fuels. However, devoting a reasonable amount of budget to developing public transport can solve these problems since public transportation systems are electric or use renewable sources of energy. Besides, the amount of fossil fuels that are consumed by public transportation is less compared to personal automobiles.
To summarize, from what has been discussed above, it is crystal clear that the government should prioritize spending money to improve public transportation. The first merit of this decision is that it improves public health. Moreover, with this attitude, the government can deal with various problems related to the environment.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68637532134 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18518230216 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570694087404 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6598057554 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269066915278 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815659994489 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673779845988 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169960919897 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757175650192 0.0645574589148 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 10.9000537634 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.