Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The issue of whether working quickly and risk making mistake is more important than working slowly aroused much controversy among people of different ages and different perspectives. Definitely, some people if were asked would agree with the statement that working quickly even by making some mistake is more important compared with the doing our task slowly and precisely, while others have a negative attitude toward this point of view. As far as I am concerned, I postulate, accomplishing our task more accurately but slowly far outweigh doing them quickly with making some faults. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on the arguments to support my view/
The first vital point to be mentioned is that this approach assists us to promote at our workplace. When you undertake the task, your most significant duty is to carry out your task accurately as much as possible, which is contrary to doing the task quickly, as this way escalate the risk of mistakes. Your performance supervised by your manager all the time, and since the manager is always looking for the meticulous employees, this attitude would be praised by them. This is why in the outstanding companies women get promotion even in the first month of their work. They care about even the details and they never ignore anything, as a result, their work is better than their male colleagues who are inclined to carry out their task in the short period of time which result in more mistakes.
In approaching this issue, apart from the reason given above, another reason that deserves some words is that making mistake due to the rush might create the devastating effects and also, recovering the mistake might be more time-consuming in comparison to doing it slowly and make sure that everything is correct. For example, as a chemical lab assistant, if you want to do an experiment in rush, it might cause dangerous happening and ruin everything. If you do your task in a company with a lot of mistakes, your boss might blame and criticize you in front of your co-workers and caused embarrassed you.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments that explored above, I am of the opinion we should accomplish our task more accurately even this way may be time-consuming because it benefits us by getting a promotion at the workplace and also, prevent us from blaming and criticizing by our employers because of our mistakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 751, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ed to carry out their task in the short period of time which result in more mistakes. In appr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, while, apart from, for example, as a result, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90196078431 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72059706764 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.1344086022 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8237212539 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.666666667 100.406767564 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 20.6045352989 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327443850619 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118526356092 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868243525179 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183434836202 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123196644007 0.0645574589148 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 11.7677419355 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.0537634409 155% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.