During the last decade, the digital revolution has altered the new industry and its delivering method to the general public. In fact, today, people can reach not only the local news but also the international one within a few seconds. Some argue that people might get more knowledge by connecting with different sources. While others hold the different opinion that different resource may mislead people and they believe that it is not good to follow different sources. From my perspective, the former view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
Primarily, if people want to know about the particular subject, it is better to rely on various resources. It helps them to be well-informed. On the other hand, the majority of new agencies all over the world talk about the issue in a biased way. They do it that intentionally or unintentionally and so, it is strongly recommended to read or hear about the news event from other sources to analyze it objectively. To illustrate this more, last year, I read about Brazil that many people were killed in a terrorist attack. Later on, when I talked with my Brazilian friend, he informed me that the news was fake. Also, I discovered that specific news website had a personal issue with the Brazilian government and thereby, they tried to spread fake news for Brazil.
Furthermore, some news channels are more powerful compared to the others. Often, popular new channels have more authority to get secret information about the different topic ranging from political issues to celebrities' personal life. Therefore, sometimes, we can get a broad idea to watch different news resources. For instance, whenever I cannot find information related to some issue on the local news channel, I always try to find it on the international news channel like BBC and CNN, and I can easily find related news broadcasted first on the international news channels.
Admittedly, there are some disadvantages to follow more than one resources for the information. Some news channels do not want to show the truth and actual reality. These channels are typically controlled by the specific political party and they always prefer to show particular new which supports the political party. Hence, in this way, people would never able to realize the truth. Additionally, the political party usually sponsors these type of news channels, and also, the new channels will increase their viewers by not showing the truth. Consequently, people cannot trust every source of what they see or hear on the television or the internet.
All in all, I strongly believe that people should take advantage of plentiful resources which are available due to technological development. This is However, it is important for them to confirm it from various sources and then only apply it in their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...lution has altered the new industry and its delivering method to the general public...
^^^
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...dustry and its delivering method to the general public. In fact, today, people can reach not o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a biased way" with adverb for "biased"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...all over the world talk about the issue in a biased way. They do it that intentionally or unint...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended reading'.
Suggestion: recommended reading
... unintentionally and so, it is strongly recommended to read or hear about the news event from other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one resource', 'a resource', or simply 'resources'?
Suggestion: one resource; a resource; resources
... some disadvantages to follow more than one resources for the information. Some news channels...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2378.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05957446809 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79410878659 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51914893617 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3608445871 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.12 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213499102561 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588955845937 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523261301051 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108610690449 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646764580414 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.