Traditional houses Vs Modern Houses
East or West, home is the best. Whether your house is an old, traditional one, or a modern, big house, It will be the best for you. However, given the choice, I would prefer to live in a contemporary one. This is because modern houses are more convenient and require better quality of everyday life.
Personally, I had grown up in an old traditional house of my grandparents. Honestly, our life was not easy, while living there as I did not have a separate room and had to share one with my brother. We have now got a new apartment, which is structured in a way that makes us feel comfortable in our own house. Each of us has a separate room, and due to the big number of rooms, my little sister even has a colorful gaming room with abundant toys. So, I really favor the new ways of structuring apartments that is exclusively made for making people’s life accessible.
Moreover, today’s houses accumulate all the primary facilities that the dwellers might need. As I mentioned above, living in our former house was a hardship. We did not have a dishwasher and not even an air conditioner. In our current house we have both the dishwasher and AC, which enhances our daily life. We use the dishwasher when we have a myriad guests and the air conditioner in the extreme hot summer days On top of that, we have a permanent availability of water and gas in our house, which was a struggle in the traditional one. That means, we can use water and gas whenever want. I think that these facilities are of vital importance for any dweller.
In conclusion, although I am not belittling the ones who live in traditional houses, I would rather live in a modern, well-designed apartment that makes my life more easy-going and comfortable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
honestly, however, if, moreover, really, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62379421222 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85114191965 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556270096463 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8629182007 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5882352941 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212831060392 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751255956098 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955914184732 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139237335046 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080884496532 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.