The debate over the number of the cars has always been a controversial issue for a few decades. Although they have great benefits for people, they also create serious problems. to my way of thinking, there will be fewer cars in the near future. I am going to support my opinion with two main arguments in the following essay.
First of all, they cause great environmental pollution. With the increase in car production, their prices have considerably decreased. When they were a new invention, their numbers were limited. Thus, only rich people could afford it. However, today, a great number of people from high class to the middle class, even some poor people, possess at least one car. They release carbon gas into the air and caused air pollution. It is a widely known fact that these gases lead to the global warming and many prominent countries are struggling to prevent this on the global platform. To tackle this problem, they may make a law restricting the use of the car.
Secondly, they cause many deaths resulted from traffic crashes. Since there are a great number of cars on the traffic, the police are not able to control if a driver has a car driver license. This courage the people, especially young adults, to drive without a license. In addition, people can get easily a car license even if they are not qualified for driving. In my opinion, besides the restriction of the usage of the cars, governments will invest money in public transportation to prevent this casualty. Thus, people will be attracted to use public transportation and they will not need to buy a car.
All thing considered, I believe that there will be fewer cars in the near future. This is because excessive use of car causes air pollution and deaths and the government will take measures to prevent these.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Eco certification and American wood companies (Integrated)Reading Section: In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological stan 97
- TPO 20 - Integrated TOEFL essay 78
- TPO 23 Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America have been steadily declining for more than a century now since about 1880 Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 93
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ple, they also create serious problems. to my way of thinking, there will be fewer...
^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...onsiderably decreased. When they were a new invention, their numbers were limited. Thus, only...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, at least, even so, in addition, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79487179487 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57857295059 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4090447071 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237875051361 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745642842082 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965963825707 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171218032642 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737958530717 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.