In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Do you agree or disagree?
No one can deny that cars play an extremely important role in our every-day life. Personally, I believe that in the future the number of our personal cars will exponentially increase. It is my belief that the development of car industry is inevitable in the future for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, cars will always be part of our environment and people will always contribute to the optimization and efficiency of automobiles, because our modern society mainly focuses on comfort. In addition, cars are an amazing way to reach barely populated areas in order to do our jobs and as a result, the number of cars will constantly increase. Moreover, having a personal way of displacement allow us to organize family trips and to travel for long distances. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. Ten years ago, my family had only one car and it was difficult for us to plan a trip from Germany, the country I come from to Italy. In addition, my uncle who lived with us worked at a nuclear power plant which was far away from city center so it required a personal car. Consequently, we were forced to book an already planned trip by a tour guide and we could not feel the freedom and of our vacations. This year, each member of my family has his own car and this is why we could much more enjoy the wonderful ancient places of Italy. Had car industry not been so developed, we would not have been experiencing such a wonderful time together and this will make our society to produce even more.
Secondly, I strongly believe that the number of cars will increase because we live in a modern society where the concept of industrialization and globalization is very widely spread throughout the entire planet. Moreover, the number of populations of our planet is constantly increasing which brings us to the fact that in the near future there will be a greater requirement for cars. In fact, if the number of people will increase there will be more mechanical and electrical engineers that will work in factories in order to build cars. For example, ten years ago my mother finished her studies at a technical university and after this she became unemployed, because of lack of jobs on the market. Nowadays, my mother has a successfully career in this domain, because our society had technically developed and our needs had also increased in matter of cars. It is certainly clear that our future cannot have fewer automobiles since our modern society is developing at a really dramatic speed.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I am certainly convinced that in twenty years cars will have a great development because we depend on them on a daily basis in order to perform our task and because is a very affordable and comfortable way of movement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make our society to produce even more. Secondly, I strongly believe that the nu...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 725, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('successfully') instead an adjective, or a noun ('career') instead of another adjective.
... on the market. Nowadays, my mother has a successfully career in this domain, because our society had...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 823, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs had" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'had' or 'to be had'.
Suggestion: had; to be had
...had technically developed and our needs had also increased in matter of cars. It is...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2380.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 504.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72222222222 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80240781186 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 779.4 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.5453133873 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.263157895 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5263157895 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168838559705 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592503807634 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442819849737 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113466191425 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00962087756648 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.