using plastic bags is beneficial
In the reading part and in the lecturer is discussed the idea of switching from using plastic bags to usage
reusable bags. They both agree with this idea, because of huge environmental problems caused by using
plastic bags.
In the reading part the first advantage mentioned is the fact that the usage of reusable bags will reduce
the number of plastic bags thrown in a garbage. That is because reusable bags can be used many times
which will cause a decline the waste of plastic bags. The lecturer agrees with this point and feel happy
that in many countries the grocery stores encourage their costumers to bring their own reusable bags.
Furthermore, this shift will save a huge amount of money for the stores, because they have not to pay
for plastic bags anymore. About this reason the author and the lecturer agree that this change in the
future can cause the price decrease in the store, because of decline of their expanses.
Another advantage of this kind of shift mentioned by the author is the petroleum saving. Thus, the
plastic bags are made from petroleum and gases, this shift will decrease the waste of such limited
resources. Moreover, the lecturer agrees with this reason and mentions that this step will save billion
barrels of petroleum and billions of dollars which are wasted to make plastic bags.
All in all, the author and the lecturer agree with the shift from using plastic bags to using reusable bags.
That is why, this change will keep environment clean and will prevent the waste of resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'garbage'.
Suggestion: garbage
...e the number of plastic bags thrown in a garbage. That is because reusable bags can be u...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 97, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...n and mentions that this step will save billion barrels of petroleum and billions of d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 263.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8897338403 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20762957933 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 212.727598566 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41825095057 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0429977396 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.166666667 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 4.53405017921 331% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265162125139 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133270397148 0.076458572812 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116543604455 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110681603093 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125648227392 0.0645574589148 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.