We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people. Inyour opinion, what are some important characteristics of a co-worker (some-one you work closely with)? Use reasons and specific examples to explain whythese characteristics are im

Essay topics:

We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people. Inyour opinion, what are some important characteristics of a co-worker (some-one you work closely with)? Use reasons and specific examples to explain whythese characteristics are important.

We all work with different kind of people. In my opimion coworker should be honest, believe in cooperation. Coworkers should helpecah other rather than competitor.

Most important is co-workers should be honest. Coworkers should be honest about how much work they have done on project, how much they know about specific things, is there might be possibility of errors in their work. As most of the organization in the world works in a team, one person builds on the work of other person, and dishonesty from an individual can affect the whole organization. For example, if a technical person fake promises that the project will be completed on one month. Business people start preparing for advertisement and sales. And when product is not available on desired time it can lead to loss to the organization.

Additionally, there should be cooperation amonst coworkers. When their is unity in an organization, people feel more closely associated with organization. For exmple, Indian team was performing badly for a while. Coaches and managers looked into what might be the problem for their bad performance. It was found players in the team belong to different cities and are good player. But there are not able to perform well as a group as they do not understand each other. Caches organizedteam bonding sessions that increased unity and help them understand each other better. Which helped team to perform better.

There should be healthy competition among team member. Coworkers who compete fairly and acknowledge each others efforts. But there shold not be a negative competition. Unfair competition like back stabbing etc this will have negative impact on an organization. For example, two of the start footballers in the same team revealed that they compete with each other. It help them work even harder and had a positve impact on their game.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...d be cooperation amonst coworkers. When their is unity in an organization, people fee...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...izedteam bonding sessions that increased unity and help them understand each othe...
^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...help them understand each other better. Which helped team to perform better. There ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...d that they compete with each other. It help them work even harder and had a positve...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, well, while, for example, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10855263158 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80630473406 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569078947368 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5917043717 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.5217391304 100.406767564 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2173913043 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.26086956522 5.45110844103 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14665408547 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456449544336 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921732738527 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102646742973 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571643206171 0.0645574589148 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.47 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.