What do you think is a better way of communication to convey your message text message or direct call?
This subject is usually wrangled about among individuals. It is not easy to concur or appose this idea with any articulation without considering the persuaisve reasons for the choice. Some people may find themselves comfortable with texts to communicate their messages; others may feel it is better to talk over the phone to convey the message. I, personally, think it is adavantageous to talk someone over the phone, rather than sending texts. I will explain my perspective with few reasons in the subsequent paragraphs.
First, by taking someone over the phone assist us to get the direct response from other person. To be more specific, when we communicate on call the other person does not have enough time to think and can give us the answer right away. In contrast, if we send the text the person may find a way to make some excuses while benefiting the time person may get with in the texts. My own experience illustrates this concept. I used to communicate with my boss on text messages. I remember whenever I used to ask any favor from my boss while communicating on text messages. He always had come up with some excuses for not helping me. In contrast, after a while I have changed my perspective and started to talk to him over the phone rather than sending him the texts. As, I would talk to him on the phone he would make less excuses and started giving me favors. Had I not started calling him rather than sending him the texts, I would not have had benefit myself with all the favors.
Secondly, when we talk someone over the phone we can get the response spontaneously. To explain more broadly, if we send texts to someone sometime we have to wait a longer period of time and we may start assuming that might be we text something wrong which other person might have not like. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Last week, I texted my girl friend. She did not reply for two days and I started thinking may be I have texted something she might had not liked. However, when I called her after two days she told me that she was busy with the family that is why she never replied. If I had not called her I would have not come to know why she was not replying me.
Finally, talking to someone over the phone gives other person feel of sense that person is importan to us. If we just text someone the other person may think that may be that person is getting importance. I would like to explain my viewpoint my mentioning the example of my new girl friend. Whenever, I text her she did not communicate with me properly, Instead she just texted me in a formal way. But when I started calling her she feel more attach to me and started taking more interest in me.
In summation, from the above mention discussion I can say it is pivotal to communicate over the phone for a myraid of reasons. It is not only help us to get the instant and direct response from the person, but it also aid us to develop better relationship with the other person, since it a better way of communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'had' and 'come'.
Suggestion: had always come
...hile communicating on text messages. He always had come up with some excuses for not helping me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 814, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun excuses is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... talk to him on the phone he would make less excuses and started giving me favors. H...
^^^^
Line 5, column 943, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'benefited', 'benefitted'.
Suggestion: benefited; benefitted
...ing him the texts, I would not have had benefit myself with all the favors. Second...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 943, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[3]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'benefited', 'benefitted'.
Suggestion: benefited; benefitted
...ing him the texts, I would not have had benefit myself with all the favors. Second...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 173, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...meone sometime we have to wait a longer period of time and we may start assuming that might be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 433, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...ply for two days and I started thinking may be I have texted something she might had n...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of sense that person is importan to us. If we just text someone the other person m...
^^
Line 12, column 382, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a formal way" with adverb for "formal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...me properly, Instead she just texted me in a formal way. But when I started calling her she fee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 434, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'feels'.
Suggestion: feels
...way. But when I started calling her she feel more attach to me and started taking mo...
^^^^
Line 16, column 219, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'aids'?
Suggestion: aids
...t response from the person, but it also aid us to develop better relationship with ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 90.0 43.0788530466 209% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2482.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 553.0 407.700716846 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48824593128 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50418848697 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.394213381555 0.524837075471 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.9 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9891483497 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5862068966 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0689655172 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.34482758621 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.88709677419 307% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125096107449 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390018389678 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396978826144 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853371595369 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139983006941 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.