When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success.
Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above?
Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
I completely agree with the given quotation. Success is a matter of hard work and perseverance, even if some people try to envy others by attributing it to luck, but fail to see the hard work that any person puts in in order to succeed.
Often times, we see people associate luck with one of the top reason when asked about why did they fail at a particular job. If luck has so much to do with a person's success, why not just wait for it your entire lifetime instead of working? For example, we can consider a student who topped his examinations versus the one who failed. Topper student, continuously worked hard towards his goals instead of just wishing for the exam papers to be easy or any kind of cheating being done while exams. While on the other hand side, the one who failed, just was dependent on luck to get easy paper and find ways to cheat during examinations. Hence, attributing luck to anyone's success might be completely absurd, failing to see the hard work that is put in behind it.
Sometimes, smart work is required, but that doesn't mean that you must entirely be dependent on luck instead of working smartly. There's no substitute for hard work. Although, some people try to work hard and rather, fail even after putting in so much efforts. The reason behind this might be completely different, instead of just being the luck factor. For example, at first, Steve Jobs, the inventor of Apple, failed a lot more time during the launch of first Machintosh PC. Even after failing, he continuously tried to work towards his goals relentlessely, which eventually led to his success. Today, Apple is one of the biggest companies who provides consumer electronics. All this fame can be only attributed to the hard work put in by Steve Jobs, even after failing at first. Hence, failing is a part of human life and should be taken up positively instead of just associating luck with failure.
Therefore, as it is right said 'Practice make a man perfect', for anyone to succeed, one must put in his entire efforts towards his goals. Just being dependent on luck without any hard work might not always try to be beneficial and would only lead to failure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
... see the hard work that any person puts in in order to succeed. Often times, we ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...r job. If luck has so much to do with a persons success, why not just wait for it your ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 45, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...times, smart work is required, but that doesnt mean that you must entirely be dependen...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
...ent on luck instead of working smartly. Theres no substitute for hard work. Although, ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...d rather, fail even after putting in so much efforts. The reason behind this might b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6640625 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50141968154 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1603371355 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2631578947 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210381737204 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761911829713 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619202923312 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151295551442 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627577814291 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.