when teacher assigns a project on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on the project
In modern civilization, methods of bettering the intellectual development of students have been a controversial issue. A multitude of people are of the opinion that teaching students to work as a team at schools are//is crucial, others hold opposite side, stating teamwork does not influence on training. The question is whether it is practical to ask the youth to work as a team on their project at school or not. There are several reasons, two of which will be explained in the ensuing essay.
To begin with, there is a correlation between boosting the creativity of students at school and working in a team. A wide range of ideas is mandatory for furthering the project. The paramount importance of working in a team is, learning new insights into the project. Moreover, the schools provide the best environment for students to learn how to respect others’ opinions in a project. It is synergies of being a member of a team, being respectful, and making decisions. All of them are possible if schools train students to associate with others to enhance the quality of their project and better still learn collaboration. For instance, association in a team will encourage all team members to suggest their ideas which trigger an improvement in the creativity of notions and participation of students. Had not students participated in a team, they would not learn new viewpoints and teamwork.
Another reason worth mentioning is that students deal with others in the project and because they have a say in their project, their self-confidence will improve. It is critical to nurture the youngsters in an environment that they have this golden opportunity to mention their ideas. If students work with others, they get rid of their comfort zone and that will have a positive impact on their self-confidence. My personal experience demonstrates a compelling example of this. When I was at school, we were obliged to present a PowerPoint which was created by me and three of my friends as members of my team. At the beginning of the project, I was too shy to point out my ideas about the project. As time went by, talking to my team members gave me the power to elaborate on all of my ideas. After that project, my self-confidence increased significantly and I participated in a vast majority of projects.
To sum up, an increment in the creativity of the youth and their self-confidence is related to putting students In teams to work on a project with others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tual development of students have been a controversial issue. A multitude of peop...
^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts to work as a team at schools are//is crucial, others hold opposite side, stat...
^^
Line 2, column 897, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not learn new viewpoints and teamwork. Another reason worth mentioning is that ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 912, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cipated in a vast majority of projects. To sum up, an increment in the creativit...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, as to, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8995215311 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04276502416 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485645933014 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4525701775 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5238095238 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26774683619 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886557800395 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579588108683 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179363675706 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218595085197 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.