Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The knowledge we gain
from personal experiences is more valuable than the experience we gain from books. Use
specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Do not use memorized examples
In modern sophisticated world, the paramount importance of gaining experience plays a pivotal role in humans’ lives. A multitude of people are of the opinion that attaining personal experience can expand human’s awareness, others hold another perspective, stating is it compulsory that people accomplish their experience from books. I profoundly subscribe to this consensus that claims it is noteworthy that we gain our experience due to our personal lives rather than by reading books. There are several reasons, two of which will be explained in the ensuing essay.
The most paramount point to mention is that whenever people gain an experience in their personal life, for they have dealt with that obstacle, next time that implement happens to them, solving it will be much easier. It is critically important for humans either solve a problem on their own or learn a lesson from that issue. Needless to say, for the very first time that humans are obliged to cope with an obstacle, they require to make an effort to find the best solution. With they have experienced that demanding issue before, or experienced something that was analogous to that problem, not only can they solve the problem faster next time but also they hurt less than before. My personal experience demonstrates a compelling example of this. When I lost my occupation for the first time, due to redundancy, I experienced severe depression for a while because of the fact that was the first time I experienced failure. After that time, I realized even if I lose my job, that is not the end of the world and that might be even the inception of a better life.
Another noteworthy and exquisite notion that comes to my mind is that humans become resilient and powerful when they feel and experience harmful and detrimental situations. Each arduous and demanding occurrence in people’s lives, might seems unbearable firstly, but as long as humans are capable of dealing with everything, they eventually win that battle. In addition, reading autobiography books might give us an insight into how to deal with an arduous situation, but that is not adequate for them to use the whole concept of the book in their real lives. It is because that even in a book which is about the real story of humans, the author might have altered some part of the story to attract the readers’ attentions.
All in all, I agree with this argument that advances the value of gaining personal experience is more than the experience humans gain by reading a book, because attaining experience facilitates dealing with problems and makes them more potent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
... to cope with an obstacle, they require to make an effort to find the best solution. Wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 858, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...perienced severe depression for a while because of the fact that was the first time I experienced failur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h problems and makes them more potent.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98401826484 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70876820707 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504566210046 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2242556444 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.4375 100.406767564 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207808453091 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697151772981 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725280102616 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150505660016 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793001879953 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.