Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

In modern sophisticated world, education plays a pivotal role in the youth’ lives. A multitude of people are of the opinion that teachers’ duties are appreciable at contemporary time compared to previous generation, others hold opposite perspective. The question is whether teachers are acclaimed on the society in modern world in comparison with the past or not. I profoundly conflict with this consensus that claims teachers are not praised on the society nowadays. There are several reasons, two of which will be explained in the ensuing essay.

The most prominent reason to mention is that because of the paramount importance of the intellectual development of the pupils, the value of the teachers’ performance has increased in the last decades. How teachers train and nurture students affect the whole society, for these students will influence their society in the future. For this regard, parents and the society endeavor to provide a golden opportunity and an affective environment to boost the youth’s knowledge. So the society invariably put on all its effort to appreciate teachers in order to provoke them to better the situation for students’ performance .Furthermore, children in the past only were trained and fostered in the small society of the family, on the contrary in the modern world, it is critically important that the youngster be trained by a sophisticated teacher, which this will enhance the importance of the teachers’ value, and reduce the possibility of being underestimated by the society.

Another noteworthy and exquisite reason that comes to my mind is that teacher had fewer students in the past, for the education was banned for the youth who were from lower class of the society. Respect to the current time, the education was not a concerned for humans, and a vast majority of the society were illiterate. Not only was not essential and integral to study, but also no one was looking for having a teacher for learning. No need for having an instructive and informative atmosphere reduced the importance of having a teacher, so they were not appreciated by humans in the past. In contrast, according to the advanced in our knowledge in all aspects in the modern civilization, it is mandatory and compulsory for everyone to be fostered by teachers and tutors in order to expand and increase his or her information. All in all, if we do not extol our teachers, we will lose our chance to improve and boost our knowledge.

All in all, I conflict with this argument that claims teachers are devalued in the current time compared to previous generation, since the education in the current time is valued by people compared to last generation and there was no prospect for all humans to study in the past.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the situation for students’ performance .Furthermore, children in the past only w...
Line 4, column 622, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...he situation for students’ performance .Furthermore, children in the past only were trained...
Line 4, column 975, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...of being underestimated by the society. Another noteworthy and exquisite reason ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2308.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06140350877 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91986699504 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.394341558 48.9658058833 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.25 100.406767564 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171846577189 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625905091267 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444831628222 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109770630304 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254248098414 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.