Where do you think the government should invest less in a difficult economic situation in arts parks and public gardens or scientific researc

Essay topics:

Where do you think the government should invest less in a difficult economic situation, in arts, parks and public gardens or scientific researc

By and large, it is established beyond doubt that a balanced economical infrastructure is of paramount importance for the development and advancement of a country. In this regard, governments are paying attention to the establishment of various sectors in the country, such as art, technological research, and parks. No doubt, all the sectors are indispensable for the success of a country. However, at the time of crises, the government has to allocate its resources to certain limits. If that is the situation, I will champion the opinion that authorities should pay minimum attention to the art department. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my stance is associated with the notion that spending resources on arts would be a wastage of precious resources at this critical time. Since it is a mere entertainment or luxury of life, so it would not be hard for people to sacrifice that. By way of illustration, five years ago, my country had to go through the same circumstances, the government lowered its budget on art and entertainment. It did not have any effect on people's life because they were still provided with the prime needs of their lives. It is worth mentioning that I was a big fan of music and I heard music to release my stress. Fortunately, I started going to the park adjacent to my house, which was quite powerful to reduce my anxiety. My example clearly manifests that minimizing the expenditure on arts would not affect people's lives dramatically.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that technological breakthroughs are critical for a country's progress. Since it provides solutions to ongoing problems by proving alternate resources. Therefore, compromising such projects would exacerbate the problems. My opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by the current pandemic situation. My country is undergoing Covid 19 pandemic. If the government will stop or reduce spending on research projects, my country would be seriously affected. People are losing their loved ones every minute; therefore, Medical research and the development of a vaccine to eradicate the root cause of this virus are essential. In a crisis like that people can live without entertainment, but if they can not survive then who will perform the arts and who will cherish the entertainment. It is crystal clear to see why spending on arts could be compromised.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that at times of crisis, spending less on art is an intelligible decision. For the sake of brevity, few points are worth reiterating. First, spending on arts would be a wastage of resources because it's just entertainment. Second, spending on technological research will provide solutions to problems, and eliminate the crises.

Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s are critical for a countrys progress. Since it provides solutions to ongoing proble...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, as to, no doubt, such as, by and large

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16129032258 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14549047078 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539784946237 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2218035283 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3076923077 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8846153846 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80769230769 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.081977278491 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226899333494 0.076458572812 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257996055962 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0551342937596 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191221423487 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.