Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay: an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun?
When it comes to finding a job with same payment, is an interesting and challenging job with less break better or a job with more vacation but less fun have more advantages? Although some believe the later stands as the priority choice, it is the former contributes greater benefits for people.
It is so argued that having more vacation may make workers happy even the job itself is boring. Because, nowadays, people are more and more focus on their social life, and this work allows having more time to play, make friends, or take rest. Supporters of this argument must be reminded that, in practicality, when people older certain age, the time they spend on social life become less. People are more likely to concentrate on accomplishment of their jobs. If the work is has less challenge, they may feel boring and unhappy. For example, world famous president such as Boris Johnson or Donald Trump have a great social life when they were young, however, when they grew up, they care more about their challenging job.
Another disadvantage of taking less fun job is that as time go by, people may feel tired about their work owing to lacking interest. Besides, people may probably do not want to learn more knowledge by virtue of lacking challenge. It may let workers do not want to stay in this company for long term and have less opportunity to get promoted. By comparison, while people are doing something they truly love, they may feel glad about it, and even if it takes lots of time, people will unaware about it. Moreover, people will want to learn more new information about their jobs and willing to stay longer. Thus, it is more likely to be promoted.
So beneficial is having a more interesting job with less vacation that it must be taken into more consideration than the other choice. It is this choice make people happy and want to learn more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt such as Boris Johnson or Donald Trump have a great social life when they were ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71865443425 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41405108508 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519877675841 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8426647544 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4375 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330942653909 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115893378928 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152501548526 0.0737576698707 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26600024038 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152351276864 0.0645574589148 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.