Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The most effective way for government to encourage energy conservation is increasing the price of gasoline and electricity.
If the aim is to encourage energy conservation, what will that method be? Although some believe increasing the price of gasoline and electricity is the most effective way, there are still lots of strategies which is better than this one.
It is so argued that people will aware the issue of reducing energy waste, if the price is increased. Because they can feel the bad consequence, when they waste electricity. Supporters of this argument must be reminded that, in practicality, this strategy do not actually solve the problem. People conserve energy because of paying price instead of protecting the environment. Thus, they may still waste electricity if one day the price decrease, or they may still use lots of plastic or other chemical material which will harm the environment. Moreover, some wealthy man may even don not care about the increasing of money. By contrast, propagating the photo of weak polar bear to make people aware the issue of global warming, or educating children to protect their earth is a greater way. People notice that they close the light which is not use or take buses is for the environment instead of themselves.
Supporters of encouraging people to conserve energy by increasing the price may still argue that method serve as a most immediate way to tackle the issue. Nonetheless, it must be noticed that the extra money spent on electricity may let large manufacturing company to move their factories to other countries. This will significantly harm local economy and let thousands of people lose their jobs. For example, in the past, there are lots of server companies which require lots of power in Europe. But, as the electricity price becomes higher and higher, those companies eventually move to China. By comparison, government can set a rule that which if there're evidences that anyone who waste energy on purpose, they will get fine. Furthermore, government can also subsidize those companies to develop machines that do not require less power. Those strategies can prevent companies from leaving the country and save energy.
Increasing the price of gasoline and electricity to encourage energy conservation is not necessarily a cog to make the machine of country run. There are still lots of methods can solve the problems and prevent the drawbacks of enhancing price from happening.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...n, government can set a rule that which if therere evidences that anyone who waste...
^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there are
...government can set a rule that which if therere evidences that anyone who waste energy ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11488250653 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76666567969 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503916449086 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8565534859 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.95 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.15 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245157294618 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766981398383 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823846654292 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187240473076 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557859280924 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.