People can solve important problems in daily life on their own or with the help from families, so the help from government is not necessary
It is so argued that people can solve important problems without help from government, because there are lots of things such as water leaking which people can fix it themselves. The supporters of this argument must be reminded that, in practicality, there’re still lots of problem can only be solved by government. When people encounter fire disaster, jewelry got stolen, or even bears in the house, people couldn’t solve all of them by the help from families, because they don’t have enough training and experience to deal with these problems. By contrast, if we rely on the help by the well-trained emergency system which is paid by government, those issues can be easily solved, and civilians can totally trust them. 9.37
The supporters of helping from administration is not necessary may still argue that the laws or regulars from government such as building or car materials, or environmental protection will increase the cost of them. The real picture of this idea, however, is that those regulars are necessary for the safety of civilians and earth. Without it, people are likely buying house which cannot withstand earthquake, car which is not tough enough to bear impact, or somethings which will harm environment and body. By comparison, under the law of ruler, people do not need to hire experts to inspect the quality of the stuff, so they can buy it safely. Besides, because all companies should follow these rules, the prices will gradually decrease due to mass production.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of problems'.
Suggestion: lots of problems
...d that, in practicality, there’re still lots of problem can only be solved by government. When ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 721, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and civilians can totally trust them. 9.37 The supporters of helping from a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, so, still, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 247.0 407.700716846 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07287449393 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72000908254 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611336032389 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 618.680645161 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.4502437845 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.222222222 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316529293691 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11933733071 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107894525024 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239407187246 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775449027419 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.