In some cities, not many controls are placed on the design and construction of the new-built homes and offices, so people can build in whatever style they like. Do you think this is a good trend?
Whether people can build a house in whatever style they like is good Issue to discuss. Although some believe this idea stands as great policy, it is building under control by government contribute better benefits for people.
It is so argued that people should have right to build their house in their own way, since people pay the money to build it. Thus, they are free to do anything they like on their own territory. The supporters of this idea must be reminded that, in practicality, people will use everyplace of their land. As a result, there may be no space for emergency exit or fire extinguisher. As long as there is a fire, the consequence will be tragic. By contrast, if everyone follows the rule government set to make a house, they will be lots of infrastructures for security. For example, in Taiwan the structure of building should be strong enough to endure earthquake. Therefore, by following the regulation, lots of lives can be saved.
Supporters of designing whatever people like of new-built house may still argue that people can unleash their abilities to build the prettiest castle they dream about. The real picture of this argument, however, is that residents will choose the cheapest way to design the appearance a house. Even if the exterior of the house is dirty or ugly, they will not pay the money to fix it. As time go by, it will hurt the image of this city. Moreover, people from another place will not be willing to move in. By comparison, when the city is design under the control of government, the appearance will be clean and beautiful. Business store or other citizens may therefore desire to stay in. As a result, the town can grow bigger and bigger, and provide lots of jobs for local people.
Constructing homes or office whatever style people like is not necessarily a cog to make the city of machine run. There are still lots of disadvantages such as security issues or design of the house that make it a bad policy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether people can build a house in whatever st...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69942196532 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60155424056 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517341040462 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5971282391 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307618220878 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866333924421 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933121439173 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204711757453 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559210571766 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.