Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The most effective way for government to encourage energy conservation is increasing the price of gasoline and electricity.
Today, consuming of sourcess of energies is a big problem in the world. There are many reasons causes that problem such as a pollution, a changing climate, decreasing budgets. All of them are impact people's life. And, Some of the world's countries have some solutions toward that problem, some of them good but some others not.
First of all, people of countries have thought for years on these energy problems. And, they created some ways for solving that problem which about consuming energy sources. And, some parts of them are an improving costs of gasoline and electricity, encouraging building other energies options such as the solar panels, the wind turbines, etc. Then, another option is using public transportation rather than a personal transportation.
Also, increasing the price of gasses is the good way in some poor countries, because these types countries do not developed enough, and they have not ample money for buying a patrol from producers when they need more a fuel oil and other a fossil-fuels. In contrast, in some big developed countries the money is not problem so that way is not an effective.
In addition, there are a few countries which produce oils and gasses. And, the most parts of them are in the middle-east, a few parts of them in the south america such a Venezuela. And, all of them ruled by U.N about their productions ant these the patrol prices managed by the big countries. Almost all of these countries produces the patrol more than their demands, they do not manage these things themselves. So, that way could affect their people effectively.
Moreover, some developed countries such like Germany, France, USA, England tend to using new renewable energy sources. For that, they created new techniques for designing the new tools, and they would encourage their member that using these types of machines. After using these things, their consuming could be dropped.
In conclusion, taking account of all above reasons, I deffinetly do not agree that statement that increasing the price of gasoline and electricity. I think that the goverments countries should follow new methods,experiments and achievements, and they should invest about them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...l of them are impact peoples life. And, Some of the worlds countries have some solutions to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...money is not problem so that way is not an effective. In addition, there are a few count...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: N
... Venezuela. And, all of them ruled by U.N about their productions ant these the p...
^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... do not manage these things themselves. So, that way could affect their people effective...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 76, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (England) must be used with a third-person verb: 'tends'.
Suggestion: tends
...such like Germany, France, USA, England tend to using new renewable energy sources. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings, their consuming could be dropped. In conclusion, taking account of all abo...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 212, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , experiments
...ents countries should follow new methods,experiments and achievements, and they should inves...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14525139665 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75799481083 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508379888268 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3885761799 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166587207724 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517534368071 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635575874467 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972995339716 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633071630484 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.