Which of the following is the best thing to do?
Interrupt and correct mistakes right away
wait until the class or meeting over are gone
say nothing
I would say the best thing to do when the teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect is to wait until the class or meeting is over and people are gone and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.And I feel this way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First , when you talk to the teacher or the meeting leader after class or meeting is over, and people are gone, then teacher or the meeting leader will not be grumpy about you or will not hold any grudge against you as you will make them realize their mistakes or errors in some private settings not in public places like classes or meeting. And private settings are found to be more effective while discussing mistakes or errors than pubic places. Otherwise , some teacher or the meeting leader will take it personally and think like you are disrespecting them by making them wrong. Drawing from my own experience, i once found that the math teacher wrote wrong solution of the problem on board and I reached out to him after the class was over. Surprisingly, he thanked me for pointing out mistakes and told that solution was wrong in next class.
Second, you also don’t feel any type of hesitation or shyness talking about the errors or mistakes after the class or meeting is over and people are gone. Also, you will get more time to rethink whether what you think is an error or mistake is indeed an error or mistake or not.From my own life experience, i once thought that some of the lines of code written by our programmer teacher were wrong. But by the end of class, I found that these lines of code were also written in a text book for the solution of the same problem. And I thanked God for not telling him right away when I noticed that these lines of code were unnecessary. Otherwise I would have made a fool of myself.
All the above statements justify why waiting until class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talking to the teacher or the meeting leader is beneficial for the people to do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is commonplace that people may be reg...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll explore in the following paragraph. To commence with, discussing with people...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riends or collaborators in the future. Secondly, avoiding criticizing people in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, after all, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79206552009 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5313225058 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5154291598 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0286618956011 0.236089414692 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0120834194127 0.076458572812 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259215985555 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0317113974934 0.150856017488 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342236266694 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.