Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading passages that three dimensions of benefits of imposing taxes on those who use the cigarette. And several reasons are offered in support of the arguement. However, in the conversation, the lecturer casts doubt on it and contradict it for the opposing three viewpoints.
To commence with, the article mentions that the taxes which are imposed on those who smoke are effective means to discourage people from keeping using the cigarette again. With much more expenditure on this product, some consumers will gradually give up buying, and this is an expected result. However, the lecturer indicate that once the price on the cigarette becomes higher than ever before, a certain number of people have no choice but to shift to buy the low-quality amd cheaper one. This, on the other hand , is much more detrimental to people's health because consumers have no idea about the content of the product.
In addition ,the reading passage suggests that the added taxes is a kind of fair practice to cover the financial cost that the cigarette users have done. This policy can facilitate the transition of extra financial burden that have been made by those who use the cigarette. However, the lecturer argue that the definition of fairness vary from person to person. Those who are in the status of high income may feel that the extra taxes on the cigarette won;t be the burden at all. But, for those who are have lower salary, this extra expenditure will definitely affect their right to smoke and they will fee quite unfair.
Finally, it is mentioned in the passage that the extra revenue acquired from the taxes are good for the development of the local development such as the education construction. However, this argument is refuted by the professor. She mentions the downside of the revenued derived the taxes of cigarette. If the goverment official could always get the chance to the stable revenue, they are not willing to allocate this revenue to any kind of new development such as museums and parks. It will affect the benefit of the local residents.
In conclusion, though the passage mentions three bebefits of the taxes on the cigarette, the profess refute the arguement .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...amd cheaper one. This, on the other hand , is much more detrimental to peoples hea...
^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e content of the product. In addition ,the reading passage suggests that the ad...
^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...;t be the burden at all. But, for those who are have lower salary, this extra expenditu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...e burden at all. But, for those who are have lower salary, this extra expenditure wi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...bebefits of the taxes on the cigarette, the profess refute the arguement .
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...arette, the profess refute the arguement .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 368.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97282608696 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56825595324 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1418847783 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901007613035 0.272083759551 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287175773382 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319921742101 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0552628190443 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402201280617 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.