Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Traveling has always been acclaimed as one of the top choices for people to relax in this fast-paced society. I believe that traveling with people who are experienced with the knowledge of the tourist sites is essential. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraph.
First of all, going to a tourist attraction with an expert in this field provides tourists with a comprehensive view to delve into the meaning behind buildings and sites. Without guidance and knowledge offered from them, people may simply take pictures in front of the historical sites, losing the golden opportunity to understand the social and historical context of tourist sites. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I first arrived at the Statue of Liberty in New York, I was fascinated by the magnificent view and couldn’t help taking pictures from different perspectives. However, I didn’t have any idea about the background of the construction of this artifact, but simply regard it as a method to catch up with the attraction of tourists. After the tour guide in our team mentioned its historical importance, I found out that this statue is full of the profound meaning behind what most people first see it. Had it not been the professional advice from the experts, I would just have appreciated the artifact from superficial and secular viewpoints.
Secondly, the company of a tour guide ensures personal safety and helps deal with potential problems that tourists may encounter. This is because people tend to be nervous and make rushed decisions when they face with urgent situations.
For example, when all my family members went to the USA to congratulate the summer vacation, my little brother got lost because of his curiosity about the local toys. After looking for him for two hours, it was still in vain. However, when our tour guide heard the news, he immediately called the local police which he had met before. Also, he borrowed the sound amplifier from the local shops to voice his volume of informing my little brother. Soon, when my little brother heard about the familiar voice, he went back to us. Thanks to the professional practice that the tour guide made in this emergency, this crisis could be solved successfully and instantly. Without the help from the tour guide, a proportion of people must feel confused and anxious when encountering an emergency.
In conclusion, people sometimes hold opposite views on whether the existence of a tour guide is necessary if they take a vacation and go to tourist sites. I contend that guidance from the experts in tourism is necessary because they deliver the professional information that moat people lack about the tourist attractions and serve as an immediate assistant when clients encounter problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll explore in the following paragraph. First of all, going to a tourist attract...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by superficial and secular viewpoints. Secondly, the company of a tour guide en...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xious when encountering the emergency. In conclusion, people sometimes hold opp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2343.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04956896552 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73492568134 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0089215444 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100697192766 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342252589847 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309267127232 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653778730425 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280091358282 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.