Which is more important for a leader the ability to win an argument about an issue or the ability to help others come to an agreement about an issue Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Which is more important for a leader: the ability to win an argument about an issue, or the ability to help others come to an agreement about an issue? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

A leader cares about everyone, leader work for the developement and betterment of each person who follows him

If leader wants to win an argument at any cost, he might be more concerned about winning argument rather than solving problem. He might look to win argument through manipulation and wit. In doing so, he might win an argument but people will not be satisfied to the solutions of an issue. This will affect negatively to his leadership. People might accepts that leader has won the argument, but they might not be fully satisfied with solutions. People will not work passiontely or in desired way as they are not in agreement toward an issue. For eample, in adject software company in meerut, team manager was very happy as he has full confident in his idea but he was not able to make his followers come to an agreement about his idea. He implement his idea but failed due to lack of unity among team.

Furthermore, Main role of the leader is building a team, a group. A team or group that is build on the values of unity and brotherhood. Beacause if any issue or problem needs to be solved it can not be solved alone by a leader or few people, whole team needs to work on it collectively, united in agreement. Be it a sports team, company or nation, main role of the leader is build unity among the group, so that they can work towards a common goal. For example,in past we have seen many policies implemented by goverment as suggested by politicians failed due to disagreement towards it in various group of a region.

Moreover, there are many more examples. Captian of Indian team MS Dhoni is regarded as one of the great leader because he unites the team and build compassion among the team. Earlier ex-captain Sourav Ganguly was intelligent and used to win arguments but his group did not agree with him. Due to which Indian team failed. MS Dhoni while sometimes does not win an argument but he has abiltiy to help his team come to an argeement about issues. Due to which team is achieving success in past years.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'implements'.
Suggestion: implements
...come to an agreement about his idea. He implement his idea but failed due to lack of unit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... work towards a common goal. For example,in past we have seen many policies impleme...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55737704918 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52479862173 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5243451883 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7894736842 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2631578947 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15789473684 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253887286042 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809318902337 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965462460379 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148597569966 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803524434775 0.0645574589148 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.