Which is more important for a leader: the ability to win an argument about issues, or the ability to help others come to an agreement about issues? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the modern 21st century a leader is the person who inspires other people to do something magnificent. Personally, I believe that to do so a leader should focus on supporting others, especially in the negotiation processes. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, for me a leader is a communicator and facilitator of the processes within companies or communities. And to have authority and weight among your colleagues you, as a leader, should take into account their opinions. It lets them feel involved in the decision-making process and therefore generate more innovative ideas and suggestions. In contrast, when a leader tries to be just right in any case, it demotivates the team and makes members feel frustrated about their impact on final outcome. Could we use an amazing Google search engine or the new iPhone 12, if these companies' leaders followed the rule that to win an argument is better than agreed on an argument? No, and , for me, this answer is obvious.
Secondly, to have the best results it is necessary that all people participated in the tasks be heard and share the solution. My experience is a compelling illustration of this. When I, as a project manager, was assigned a new sophisticated project, that should have been done in a short period, I prepared the plan and introduced it to the team. I was sure that it was a great plane that would lead us to success. Unfortunately, no one, except me, thought so. That is why I organized a brainstorming session to discuss the approach and to come to an agreement about the project. As a result, everyone accepted the new plan and committed to making the most to meet the deadline.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that a good leader helps others to agree. This is because it allows people to show their best, and, additionally, only decisions shared by others have a chance to be realized as planned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the following essay. To begin with, for me a leader is a communicator and fa...
^^
Line 4, column 690, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tter than agreed on an argument? No, and , for me, this answer is obvious. Seco...
^^
Line 6, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o making the most to meet the deadline. In conclusion, I strongly believe that a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in any case, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81194029851 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92337512042 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602985074627 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.102429592 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206929716985 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528665984728 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595766574045 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10667222472 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581015884791 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.