which one better to work close to your home or to live far away from your work with a high salary Which one do you like and why

Essay topics:

which one better to work close to your home or to live far away from your work with a high salary. Which one do you like and why?

Hectic live has a tremendous impact on people's life. Some idividuals like to work in any place in order to collect money. From my vantage point, I believe that the salary is not important for me. I would like to live near my job for the following reasons.

To begin with, Living near your job help workers to save a lot of afford. living in a near distance could reduce people's tension. For example, I am working in a dental clinic as dental hygenist. My work location about 5 miles away from my resident. I need just 10 minuts to reach my work destination. I am waking up early and prepare my breakfast with my family everyday. Also, I am performing some physical activities because a have a lot of spare time. On the other hand, My co- worker lives on far away area. He drives for More than hours to reach his job. He can not perform any things before he comes to his work. In addition, He reachs to the work tired and on sterss from the road's traffic. Before a few days, he came with headach from the streat crowding. Now, He thinks in leave his job in order to have less tension life.

Secondly, living in a far away distenation is more expensive for labrorers. Employees commitminits will increase. For instance, if workers live in a long distance location, they will paid more money for many expensis. They should pay for car's feul, car's maintenace, Toll, paid way to reach their work fast, for paying food beacuse they do not have time to cook or to come back for their home to eat their lunch break. All these commitment will need more money from workers. As a result, if the employe pay a good salay for their workers, They will pay it alot of for their life's commitments. On the other hand, with low salary price could save money because they do not have a lot of responsiblities.

To wrap it, contemplating for all aforesaid reasons, Working in a near distention have more benefites for laborers than

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Living
...b help workers to save a lot of afford. living in a near distance could reduce peoples...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...and prepare my breakfast with my family everyday. Also, I am performing some physical ac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increase. For instance, if workers live in a long distance location, they will p...
^^
Line 8, column 185, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'pay'
Suggestion: pay
... in a long distance location, they will paid more money for many expensis. They shou...
^^^^
Line 8, column 424, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this commitment' or 'these commitments'?
Suggestion: this commitment; these commitments
...heir home to eat their lunch break. All these commitment will need more money from workers. As a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave money because they do not have a lot of responsiblities. To wrap it, con...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 15.1003584229 13% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49572649573 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46596955293 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.873186642 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.12 100.406767564 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.04 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174567304686 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553578343257 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039298429107 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105456357886 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453987508414 0.0645574589148 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 11.7677419355 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.