Which one do you prefer? Why?
1) A company offering you a job with challenging and interesting projects but less vacation days or
2) Another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but has more vacation days.
In our hectic life, jobs are contributed in most part of our daily lives. Accordingly, being in the right job is a vital issue to be satisfied. The interrelation between career and private life has got closer in recent decades. A question can be raised in this regard is that what type of jobs are more appealing. One standpoint idea states challenging and fascinating jobs with fewer vacation days are superior to jobs with opposite features. I concur with the statement and in the ensuing lines, I will delve into two reasons to substantiate my point.
The first reason is that interesting works help you to reach another/ other inspiring goals in your life. Your passion and motivation to solve and cope with intellectual projects improves your skills and abilities which bring you an opportunity to get promotion in your career. Consequently, you get famous in your prowess and earn more money which are the two desired goals of everybody. For example, like other fresh students my brother studied engineering first, but after a while, he understood he wants to be a psychologist interacting with challenging social problems. According to his motivation, he graduated from one of the best universities in my country with the impressive grades and became well-known. Now, he is running his clinic with some of his friends which is amazing as we didn’t think he could be that prosperous in this field.
Second, if you really like your job, the vacation days will not be an issue. There are a lot of people who work more than 10 hours a day. In the perspective of many others, it is not a normal behavior, but if you ask industrious guys about it, they will say they love their works and prefer to spend time in their workplace. Hence, not only can the job itself fulfills you but also you have an increasing enthusiastic to expand it. Take, for instance, top managers of big companies. They spend most of their time in their office, various meetings, and practical workshops. Although they are rich and able to have several fantastic luxuries trips around the world, they usually have a one trip in the whole year and choose to be with their firms and organizations. Had they not have this satisfying feeling, they wouldn’t have lived like this.
In summary, all the aforementioned ideas bring us to the conclusion that challenging jobs with fewer holidays are a better option that boring works with more vacations as you have the chance to gain other important things in your life and your job is interesting enough to dissuade you of wanting more vacations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-30 | aliasghar | 47 | view |
| 2018-11-09 | saeed-iz | 86 | view |
| 2018-10-15 | zabanenglish | 66 | view |
| 2018-10-15 | zabanenglish | 66 | view |
| 2018-08-28 | Fetemeh | 70 | view |
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task 76
- TOEFL TPO 45 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 92
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement We can learn more from people at a higher level than us like teachers than from people who are at the same level as us 87
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 855, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...could be that prosperous in this field. Second, if you really like your job, the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'luxuries'' or 'luxury's'?
Suggestion: luxuries'; luxury's
...rich and able to have several fantastic luxuries trips around the world, they usually ha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, really, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75596880816 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560090702948 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5565624175 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290363091984 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811488370814 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823925660033 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188371099422 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572722743136 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.