Which one of the following options is a better choice to help you gain confidence when speaking in the classroom the community and the workplace Why Practicing your speech before the presentation Using techniques and methods Learning from other experience

Essay topics:

Which one of the following options is a better choice to help you gain confidence when speaking in the classroom, the community, and the workplace? Why?
Practicing your speech before the presentation.
Using techniques and methods
Learning from other experiences.

Gaining confidence during speaking in the community and the classroom is, and has always been, one of the issues to be argued by people, especially students. From some people's perspective, practicing before the presentation or using techniques is very beneficial. However, I believe that learning from other experiences play far more crucial roles in people's confidence due to the fact that it will bring about profitable aspects for individuals.
First and foremost, if students learn from other experiences, especially their teachers, they will have more chances and opportunities to boost their knowledge and broaden their horizons helping them be more successful. In other words, when students learn from other experience, it has a productive and positive effect on them since they notice that do not repeat the same mistakes that they did every time. My own experience demonstrates this concept. When I was doing my master's degree in biology at the University of Ferdowsi in Iran, I had difficulties speaking in front of numerous people and I did not have enough confidence. I remember I was practicing a lot, but it was not useful at all. One day, I shared my problems with one of my professors, who had an excellent experience about this issue, and he told me instead of staring at the ground, looking at my classmates' eyes. In the course of time, I could learn how to do not repeat my mistake and I had confidence during my lectures. If I had not spoken with my professor, I could not have had a confidence to speak in my classes.
Furthermore, by learning and speaking with other people, who are knowledgeable and have the experience, people can communicate with others easily and gain confidence in their speaking. It is true that practicing or using techniques is important, however, I assume that using other experience is more practical and useful since people know that they are not the only person who have difficulties. For example, my brother, Sina, who is working in a computer company, said that he had difficulties to speak in his workplace when he started his job since he did not have any confidence. His manager, one day, told him that he had the same problem when he came to the company. By speaking with his manager, my brother could release his tension and address his problems because he understood that everybody can have this difficulty. Now, he can speak in the companies' meetings without any problems. Learning from other experience, therefore, is going to constructively and productively affect people's behaviors.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that learning from other experiences is far better. I feel like this because it allows people to do not repeat the same mistakes that they did it before. Also, it provides people the opportunity to increase their relationship with other people and figure out others have the same problem like them.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... people, especially students. From some peoples perspective, practicing before the pres...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in other words, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 43.0788530466 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2403.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9751552795 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8896803045 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453416149068 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4378739382 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242877349542 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837124317172 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590809724093 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169233438 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699203293424 0.0645574589148 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... people, especially students. From some peoples perspective, practicing before the pres...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in other words, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 43.0788530466 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2403.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9751552795 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8896803045 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453416149068 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4378739382 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04761904762 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242877349542 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837124317172 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590809724093 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169233438 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699203293424 0.0645574589148 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.