In general, each company has plenty numbers of employees with many different duties to do for each day. Managers' roles are so important owing to the fact that they should allocate the whole duties to employees based on their skills. Another factor that is so essential in this allocation is employees' satisfactions, which are directly related to their tasks per a workday. In this case, many people want to know which strategies increase the employees' satisfaction. A common idea is allocating consistent tasks for each worker per a working day. I personally repudiate this strategy. In what follows, I will delve into two reasons to shed light on my response.
First reason that comes into my mind is that having different tasks in each workday prevent workers from being tired. In this era with lots of exhausting works for each company, there are lots of pressures on each employee in each working day; if any worker has different task to do, they would get bored harder than when they have just similar duties, because they can communicate with other parts of the company. I remember when I entered into my first job, I was junior and I had not had any experience before; but my manager asked me to do other department's tasks in addition to my own duties. But now, I am working for a brokerage with lots of similar duties. Whenever I look back to those days, I feel more satisfied, because of having more challenging duties and friendly communication with the others.
Second, should workers have different takes to do, they feel being more useful. Workers need to know about how much useful they are, because they just see profitability of the company and want to know their shares in this regard. If managers put workers on different duties, they wouldn't think that they are just a minute part of a big company and they would feel having more advantages. Again, on those days, I really thought that I am not an ordinary worker, and when I found myself during doing a lot of tasks about other aspects of the company, I felt more satisfied. It is exactly in opposite with my current feeling, because in these days, never I do find myself useful for the whole company.
To recapitulate, we can conclude that although some workers like to have similar duties for each working day, most of the employees feel more satisfied, if they have diversification in their tasks. This is because having different tasks not only makes them to feel being more useful but also prevent them from being tired and bored. Thus, I personally suggest that managers should use this strategy to increase the loyalty of their workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ny has plenty numbers of employees with many different duties to do for each day. Managers rol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...t to know which strategies increase the employees satisfaction. A common idea is allocati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s put workers on different duties, they wouldnt think that they are just a minute part ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, really, second, so, thus, i feel, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2165.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76872246696 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52602072941 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469162995595 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.987029748 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32502027551 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100284609255 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748586418171 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210242422024 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678396000994 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.